Monday, June 16, 2014

Electronic Data Capturing (EDC) Movement

To All the Members of the R&D Leadership Team,

Before I begin, I would like to thank you all for being here and for giving me the opportunity to present my findings on whether or not to move forward with electronic data capturing (EDC) in order to minimize costs associated to the clinical trials related to the launching of a new drug.

We currently perform on clinical trials using a paper base method which takes a substantial amount of time to be finalized or in others words, entered into our database without any errors in order for final analysis to be performed.  Our investigator sites, medical offices who participate in our drug trials, have been entering all the patients’ medical history and outcomes/side effects of every visit on a paper form for years now.  However, has been proven to be lengthy as we must have a third party enter this data into an electronic form database, which is entered three times by three different entities, in order to very that all data is accurate to the tee. 

This is costly and very archaic when the move to electronic data has been moving at such as fast pace.  Our cost per case report form (CRF) entered manually is currently $6 to $9 dollars per page while if entered electronically the cost is only $3 to $4 dollars, meaning EDC is cutting our CRF costs in half. We have ran test trials in order to verify that the electronic data capturing would decrease the amount of time a drug take to go from its trial phase to being sold to patients.  The trial was conducted using participating sites whom some already have advanced skills using the internet and some did not even have a computer onsite.  The cost in purchasing computers for some sites was not substantial, however, the time it took to train them with the usage of computers was found to be tedious.  Overall, the time it takes to enter a patients full case from begin to end and then locking it up for analysis, error free I might add, has been cut by half.  This shows how it is instrumental that we move forward with this implementation and there are a few methods which can be used to help us with this.

The roles played by our clinical research associates (CRA’s) can be revamped in order to include usage facilitation, a customer service role addition to their job description.  They are able to perform this as they are now fully trained on our EDC program as they are the one who visit the clinics in order to verify that the data is entered correctly into the online web-based program.  They can offer full-time support if we create course materials and actual in person courses for all personnel. This may be lengthy in the beginning of implementation, however, in the long-run we predict a fully self-sufficient program which might decrease the number of personnel we currently require.   

Next, the creation of compliance training so that clinics can be reminded on why the data entered is so important, how it should be entered, what happens to the data after it is locked up, what they can do to help improve the process and finally their feedback.  Feedback will be very important as it will be our only method of understand what the sites require and how we can facilitate this process for them.

If well planned out EDC can improve our process in many ways, not only by decreasing costs associated to the clinical trial process but as well as increasing productivity in launching new medical drugs faster.  This will help us recover funds used in the creation and implementation of the medical drug as well as decrease the amount of sales lost due to launching time.

I hope this helps all the members in the R&D Leadership Team come to a concise decision on the implementation of electronic data capturing.

If you have any question, please let me know as I will be more than happy to answer them for you.

Sincerely,

Jennifer Couto

No comments:

Post a Comment